First Class Christians: Musings from Election Day, 2006, flying into Washington, DC with Charles Colson
At the airport newsstand I pick up
a bottle of water and a copy of Newsweek.
There’s US
flag-wrapped cross on its cover and articles on politics and Christianity
inside.
November 2006 |
I bring
them to the counter for the casher to ring up.
“You sure that’s all you want?” he asks me
with a playful smile.
Just what I
need today—some wise-ass.
“Yeah,” I say, “You got the water,
right?”
“Yeah,” he
says, “But--you sure that’s all you
want?”
“Yeah.”
“So you’re really ready to have me ring you up?”
“Yeah,” I
smile a little, since he doesn’t seem like a creep. But I don’t get what’s
going on.
“O-kay!” he pushes a button and the total,
$6.66, appears on the LED screen, “You owe me six-six-six!” he says and
chuckles, “The mark of the Beast!”
Glad he has
a sense of humor, I think. That beats a self-proclaimed, end-times prophet by
a damn sight. I hand him a twenty.
“And I owe you…..thirteen dollars and thirty-four cents,”
he hands me my change.
“Great,” I say, chuckling with him.
“Hey, don’t
worry,” he says, “I’m only playing around. After all, you’re only going to fly
in a plane on Election Day!”
He’s a
guileless goofball and I laugh with him.
“Take care!” he calls out as I head
back to the gate for boarding.
My partner
makes this trip often in order to take care of his elderly mother. Because of
that, we got a first-class upgrade on the way down—my first time in
first-class--and now again on the way home.
During my maiden voyage among the
privileged I discovered the real reason to like first-class flying. It’s not
the roomier seats or the pillow and blankets. It’s not even the tasty snacks,
although I ate more than my share of high-end potato chips on the way down.
It’s the wine. They let you have a glass before take-off. And just before that
sexy/scary moment when the plane rattles down the runway so fast you think
you’ll either have an orgasm or a panic attack, they come and take away your
empty plastic cup so nothing will fly around and stain your business suits.
Then a few minutes later, right
after you’ve finished saying your frantic prayers—please God, let us not crash on take-off—and the plane has reached
cruising altitude, those angels of mercy return. Chardonnay, wasn’t it? Yes,
thank you. Thanks so
much. It’s snacks
and wine the whole way, which is a very fine thing for a fearful flyer like me.
Boarding
begins. We file into the plane, stow our carry-ons, and glance around at the
other travelers. Don’s looking for celebrities. I’m looking for terrorists.
“Look who’s
right ahead of us,” he whispers to me.
“Who?” I
whisper back.
“Look.
You’ll recognize him.”
The man is
speaking to one of the flight attendants in a resonant voice. He’s tall and she
is smiling up at him. His wife is tall, too. White-haired, bulky. She wears a
bright red jacket and on the lapel, a large pin of the American flag.
“He’s a
pastor. Just like you. Only not Lutheran,” Don says.
“That narrows it down a lot. Not
Desmond Tutu in whiteface?"
“No, this
man is very, very American--.”
“Who is it?”
“Charles Colson.”
It takes me a minute, but then I
remember:
“Chuck Colson? Nixon’s Chuck Colson?
Don nods
and peers through the crevice between the seats.
“It looks
as though he’s reading over the text of some prepared remarks he’s going to be
making.”
“Well, it is Election Day.” I say, “And we’re
flying into Washington.”
“Right,” he says. Then he sits back and opens the New York Times. That’s my cue to shut up for a little bit. I ignore it.
“Right,” he says. Then he sits back and opens the New York Times. That’s my cue to shut up for a little bit. I ignore it.
“Wow!” I whisper, “You must feel really safe, traveling with two men of God--me and
Mr. Colson.”
He raises
his eyebrows. I wave the cover of Newsweek
at him.
“And
look—see? See what’s on the cover?”
He nods. He
points to a newspaper article about whether or not the right to choose one’s
gender would become a legal option in New
York state.
“I don’t
think he’d support that,” I say,
pointing my finger through the paper at the seat ahead of me.
“Go ask
him. Go introduce yourself to him.”
“Right.”
“No, I’m
serious. You should do it.”
“Yeah. And
maybe I could have a talk with him about Jesus. And politics.”
The flight attendant starts down
the aisle with a basket of snacks.
“Do you want a glass of wine?” Don
asks.
“No,” I
say, then pause, “Only if you do.”
But when
she offers us beverages, he orders a seltzer and I begin repeating to myself my
standard airplane prayer: Please keep us
safe, God, and please keep me calm. Please keep us safe, God, and please keep
me calm.
Soon we’re
rumbling and bumping down the runway, my heart pumping along with the speed of
it all. Then the landing gear thuds into place and we’re off the ground and
climbing. I don’t like the climbing part. I rifle through articles in Newsweek, but mostly focus on the
pictures. At the bottom of one of the pages is a spectrum showing the relative
conservatism or liberalism of American Evangelical leaders. Lo and behold,
Chuck Colson’s smiling face is on the spectrum, far to the right on the
right-hand page.
I’m
thinking about his face in Newsweek,
about his presence in the seat ahead of me. He thinks he loves Jesus. I think I
love Jesus, too. Only we don’t love him in the same way. Which way is better?
Just then the plane gives a serious
jolt and even Don raises his eyes from the newspaper.
“That’s okay, isn’t it?” I ask.
“Yeah, it’s always choppy getting through the clouds.”
“I thought we were through them by now.”
“Yeah, it’s always choppy getting through the clouds.”
“I thought we were through them by now.”
“There are
a lot of clouds today,” he says, pointing out the window. I don’t look.
The plane
keeps bumping along, even though we have leveled off. The pilot, a woman (can
women fly planes?) comes over the loudspeaker giving us details about the
weather here and at our destination. She tells us it will be a pretty bumpy
ride for most of the flight. There are storms along the coastline all the way
to Washington.
Now that I
am supplied with that information I don’t hesitate when the flight attendant
comes by at cruising altitude. I order some white wine. White wine midday seems
less of a commitment to alcoholic degeneration than red wine does.
Don orders
wine, too. He grabs a few packages of snacks, gets out his IPOD and gives me
one of the earpieces. The Bach cello concertos. Too mournful. I shake my head.
Then he
gets out his laptop and begins a game of hearts.
I think about Jesus. Or more
correctly I think about what I think about Jesus. And his followers. I don’t
like a lot of his followers. Maybe we are all laboring in the same vineyard,
but it’s a vineyard of varying microclimates and we are harvesting different
kinds of grapes. And that’s me being metaphorically generous.
Take Chuck Colson, for example. He
had been a hawk, a staunch supporter of the Viet Nam war and of Richard Nixon.
He had authorized the firebombing of Daniel Ellsberg’s psychiatrist’s office
and the theft of the Pentagon Papers. Even I had heard about all that, although
I was still reading Nancy Drew when Watergate stories were flooding the media.
Shortly after he was convicted, Chuck
Colson found Jesus. People made fun of him, saying he had converted because he
thought he would get a lighter sentence. And sure enough, he only served seven
months.
But apparently he had been serious
about turning his life over to God. When he got out of prison he started an
advocacy ministry for inmates and he donated all of his profits from lectures
and books to the prison ministry. To his way of thinking this was loving Jesus
with his whole life.
But he also endorsed the invasion
of Iraq.
I can’t square that with the love of God, even though I know that language of
war pervades sermons and hymns. George Duffeld’s bathetic19th-century hymn is
a potent example:
Stand up, stand up for Jesus, ye soldiers of
the cross
Lift high his royal
banner; it must not suffer loss.
From victr’y unto
victr’y his army shall he leadeth,
Till ever foe is
vanquished and Christ is Lord indeed.
No wonder so many people don’t
like Christians. I don’t like them, either. Not that kind, anyway. So what kind of one am I? Superior? Smarter? More Christ-like?
Hubris, if I would acknowledge it,
probably leads me to think so. But I also know that playing ‘us’ and ‘them’
doesn’t resolve anything.
For
example, here I am, one seat behind Chuck Colson, flying over God’s country on
Election Day, drinking white wine in broad daylight. No one would think I was a
pastor. I’m a girl, for one thing. I’m not wearing a clerical collar or WWJD
bracelets or any other such identifiable marks of the professionally religious.
Instead I’m in jeans and a tank top sitting next to my boyfriend with whom,
according to the expectations of unmarried Lutheran clergy, I am not supposed
to be traveling in quite this fashion.
Was this loving Jesus with my whole
life? Surely not, according to some.
But it wasn’t not loving Jesus.
And on we
fly on into dense, bright clouds and pocket after pocket of turbulence. The
plane sways back and forth; the wine sways back and forth. Things rattle in
overhead compartments. Eventually Mrs. Colson signals to the flight attendant.
I hear her asking about the turbulence.
“Oh, it’s
going to be with us,” the flight attendant answers, “It wasn’t this bad on the
way down this morning. Now the atmosphere is much more unsettled. But there’s
nothing to be concerned about. I’m not worried.”
If Mrs.
Colson, married to a redeemed sinner, a national man of God, is allowed to be
scared, then I’m allowed to be scared, too.
“Can I get
you anything?” I hear the flight attendant ask her.
She decides
she will have another Diet Coke.
Then the
flight attendant steps back to our row.
I need to
hear it for myself, the same reassurance she gave to Mrs. Colson. Good news
bears repeating.
“This
turbulence—is it okay that there is so much of it?”
She smiles
at me.
“It’s fine, honestly. The pilot is
trying to find an altitude where it’s not so bumpy, but so far she hasn’t had
any luck. But I’m not worried. Can I get you anything to drink?”
“White
wine,” I whisper, lest the Colson’s think I’m bibulous.
But why?
Why do I fear their judgment? Do I think Chuck Colson is a better, holier
pastor than I am?
I don’t, I guess. Not really. But I
know that Christians of my kind are far outnumbered by Christians of Colson’s
kind. I know that traditional denominations—Presbyterian, Episcopalian,
Methodist, Lutheran—have been hemorrhaging members for decades. I also know
that, though there are many active social progressives within these traditional
denominations, the religious right has been more organized, more activist, more
compelling and more effective in calling for what it sees as correct social and
moral change.
One of the
scariest passages in the gospel of Matthew is the story Jesus tells about what
will happen come the Day of Judgment. What he says is that when the Son of Man
comes all humanity will gather before him. Like a shepherd separating sheep
from goats, the Son of Man will separate those worthy of a ticket to eternal
bliss from the unworthy, those who deserve nothing less than eternal damnation.
Come, you that are blessed and inherit the
kingdom prepared
for you from the foundation of the world;
for I was hungry and you
gave me food, I was thirsty and you
gave me something to drink, I was
a stranger and you welcomed me, I
was naked and you gave me clothing,
I was sick and you took care of me, I
was in prison and you visited me.
Matthew
25: 34-36
Once the
good-deed-doers are given the go-ahead to enter the eternal Ritz-Carlton, the
ones who didn’t do good deeds are condemned to the eternal fire.
“But,
Lord,” the thunderstruck condemned protest, “when was it that we saw you hungry
or thirsty or a stranger or naked or sick or in prison and did not take care of
you?’
And he
answers them: “Truly I tell you, just as you did not do it to one of the least
of these, you did not do it to me.”
Lutherans
cringe at this story. Lutheran theology is grounded in the idea that there is
no way to gain God’s favor by performing good deeds.
But politically-organized,
socially-activist fundamentalist Christians are motivated to live out their
interpretation of this passage from Matthew. This may or may not involve
clothing the naked or feeding the hungry. But apparently on par with those
kinds of good deeds are abstinence education, home-schooling, creationism, gun
ownership, biblical literalism and the crusade to keep one-man, one-woman
marriages the only legal coupling. The religious right seems hell-bent that
this is being heaven-bound.
Conservative
historian Bruce Shelley’s book, Church
History In Plain Language is a serviceable and readable one-volume history.
But when he discusses the last few decades of Christianity, his approbation of
the religious right bleeds through:
The passion of the Religious Right lay in
their perception that
the United States was falling under the
influence of secular humanism
and that traditional family values
were under attack in the media and
the public schools…To counter the
agenda of the cultural left, the Reli-
gious Right preached, promoted, and
marched against abortion, the
Equal Rights Amendment,
homosexuality, pornography, and the
increased government involvement in
education and welfare. (p. 477)
From the
Moral Majority to Promise Keepers, from the Christian Coalition to faith-based
initiatives, it’s pretty clear that the religious right is at home with
political activism. Organized, well-funded, well-connected, most of these
efforts have had success with at least some, if not all of their goals.
On the other hand, it sometimes
seems Christian progressives have trouble even identifying goals. Sure, we serve soup at the soup kitchens. We
vote to be welcoming and inclusive to persons of all sexual orientations. We
send student groups to New Orleans and New York. We drink shade-grown,
fairly-traded coffee.
But what we don’t do a lot of is
organized political lobbying for gay rights, reproductive rights, economic
justice and all the other worthy concerns we end up mostly paying lip service
to. We hew to the separation of church and state. And we quarrel pointlessly
about whether or not homosexuality is sinful, whether or not homosexuals can marry
or become ordained clergy. We quarrel. And no one outside the quarreling groups
listens or even cares.
Meanwhile, the plane bumps its way
along to our nation’s capital. The flight attendant sits in her seat, flipping
through a Coldwater Creek catalog. Mrs. Colson reads her book. Mr. Colson
checks his speech. Don has switched to the Chopin Scherzos. I am fingering my
magazine, drinking my wine, anxious to get to Washington.
I know that I am in no danger of
becoming a religious conservative. The only way I can remain Christian at all
is by believing firmly in the unearned grace of God—even though I’m
hard-pressed to spell out what that actually means.
I do know that every week I write
the sermon, every week I pass out the disks of faith and sips of hope during
Holy Communion. When someone is sick I visit. When someone has died, I say the
time-honored words of assurance: In sure
and certain hope of resurrection to eternal life we commend to almighty God,
our sister/brother __________ to the ground, earth to earth, ashes to ashes,
dust to dust.
When someone says they have no
faith/their faith is weak/they want more faith I assure them of all that we
don’t need to comprehend in order to be faithful, all the while knowing how
much I want to know about the ineffable
and the maddeningly uncertain.
Is mine just brain-faith,
book-learned and vague? I don’t think so.
And yet, if Charles Colson--a man
whose politics I abhor and whose theology I reject—were to turn around in his
seat right now and ask me what I had done to serve Jesus lately, I’m not sure I
would know what to say.
I would say I love God with all my heart and every day I TRY to love my neighbor in whatever form that may take at that moment.
ReplyDelete